1. Janet Guastavino April 19, 2019 @ 8:05 pm

    So much to be said on this topic—and you cover it well. It’s all bundled with conversations including classism, sexism, and racism.
    I particularly liked the line, “Sure, there may be a totes legit reason for a non-Hindu woman to wear one (a Bindi) – and if there is, those who own the tradition will put it on her themselves.”
    I look forward to responses . . .
    (I love that you included your baby picture!)

  2. Risa Aratyr April 20, 2019 @ 2:08 am

    Hey, Jan. Thanks for reading. Kind of you to say I covered the topic well, but really, and despite the length of my ramble, I had a rather narrow focus: a bit of hearsay that rankled big time.

  3. Blair Zarubick April 19, 2019 @ 8:20 pm

    I don’t really have an answer to this conundrum-There surely is plenty of bad behavior from White people and I try to check myself. But hey I’m not giving up the blues. There have been no native Bast worshipers for over a millennium. Whenever people talk of “race” I get edgy and want to remind folks that race is not a legitimate biological classification. This is part of the trouble Liz Warren got in with her 23 and me shit. At the end of the day she gets a pass because most “woke” people take their cues
    from PBS which pimps the DNA identity scam. If they read more Indigenous writers they might be more concerned. I hope Oberon wasn’t too hurt or lost a friendship.

  4. Risa Aratyr April 20, 2019 @ 2:41 am

    Hey, Blair. First off, so sorry, I expressed the post biz poorly and misled you. The post’s author was as dismayed as Oberon and yours truly at the idea of banning white people from Bast worship. Oberon’s response, like my own, was essentially rhetorical; directed to people we have never met.
    As for the blues – or any musical style – it’s only cultural appropriation if you have no clue what you’re doing and you don’t acknowledge your sources. I sang séan nós because I had the help, coaching, encouragement, and blessing of Bill and Nora – a lovely couple from Cork, fine traditional musicians both, native speakers, and Bill a true singer of the old style if ever there was one. That’s my point. The Chinese can sing Mozart, Americans can do Bulgarian dances – everything isn’t automatically appropriation.
    As for your points on race, DNA, PBS, and Liz … with so much semantic and scientific confusion, is it any wonder the public conversations about sensitive social issues go awry?

  5. Declan Kenny April 23, 2019 @ 6:57 am

    Arrah! And another crackin’ post! Always a pleasure to read your work. Really, you should do more of it ;-)
    As I was reading through, I was thinking about football teams. No reason in the world for me to support United, other than my older mates at the time did, and so, therefore, did I. I have no connection with Manchester. At all. As is the case with many Irish folk who follow English teams.
    Every group of people who come together out of a common interest inevitably develop the ‘keeper of the flame’ mentality. Cyclists are an odd bunch. Google the Velominati Rules. It’s a fun piece of work, but there are those that take it fairly literally, and use it as a stick to beat others. These people are idiots who should be politely ignored.
    My own rules on religion are fairly simple, and it saves me a lot of time. Every religion can be discussed with a flow chart. The first question is: “Is this god created by man, or is man created by this god?” and because it’s my own particular device, my answer is always the same. Man created god. Once you reach that conclusion, everything thereafter is an interesting discussion about faith, culture, anthropology and sociology. But only on the understanding that the whole thing is a creation of bipeds on the planet surface. It keeps things very simple. Nothing patronising about it either; lots of time for the positives of faith. (And as you know, I enjoy a spot of living history re-enactment, so I have a keen interest in culture and religion, and have met some odd folk who takes things too far…)
    But that’s an unfair tangent I am taking.
    Your central point is spot on.
    And so I leave you with a misquote:
    “For the night is dark and full of gobshites…”

  6. Risa Aratyr April 24, 2019 @ 4:09 pm

    If we had a chin-wag about the bees in my bonnet before I blogged, my posts would be so much better.
    You can’t see me, but I am face-palming again at the depressing thought of anyone taking those 82 comically brilliant, excessively explicit, and ridiculously appearance-conscious Velominati Rules seriously. I mean, seriously? But point well taken, and well illustrated by your footy example. While my allegiances clearly lie with Liverpool and Barça, I nurture that soft spot in my heart for Newcastle because I was in Newcastle when I discovered football, and the ambient loyalties were too pervasive to resist.
    I love your flow chart – apt, pithy, easy to follow. Hate to break it to you, though . . . while men create gods, the Great Mother birthed the universe and everything in it, so it’s a moot point. Moot chart. Whatever. My concept of divinity wins, neener-neener. :D
    Not an unfair tangent; it cuts to the heart of it. All facetiousness aside, if we’re discussing culture without discussing faith, anthropology, and sociology, then we’re not really discussing culture at all.
    And you are too, too right about the night.

  7. R. Lee Smith April 30, 2019 @ 5:37 pm

    Loved it.

    My simplification of your excellent post for simpletons like myself.

    Since, as far as I know not, a bleed’n one of us bipedal mammalian hominids I will call a hu-person (Coining the word out of respect for everyone that explodes at the use of guy, gal or any male privileged generalization) has had any part in the determination of their origin, subspecies or any deviation thereof I feel a need to vehemently and forcefully cast my ha’penny in favor of those who believe that mine or anyone else’s negative or positive comments about the choices that any other of the above described hominid makes about the color, size, choice of dress, belief system, final destination, ceremonial preference, dietary habits, choice of habitation, occupation, national origin, sexual preference, language or any of said choices not harmful to other living creatures should not be given the consideration of having the weight of a mouse’s flatulence. (Phew! Pause for breath)

    From historical research I conclude that any effort to influence someone else’s choices is motivated by one or more of the following:
    1) Fear that one has not made the best choice for themselves
    2) The fear of competition or displacement.
    3) The desire to control others for money and/or power.
    4) The desire to validate inflicting cruelty on others.
    5) The insanity of pure evil.

    In short, just a hunch that minding only the business of our own choices would make for a better world.
    R. Lee Smith

  8. Risa Aratyr May 1, 2019 @ 3:57 pm

    Lol – what a marvelously convoluted and PC opening, and what an articulate argument for minding one’s own biz.
    Clearly we’re much in accord here, though I may be a bit more gung-ho about privilege-class people upping their game in the realm of social sensitivity. Just the other day I came across an old (Oct, 2015) Atlantic.com article by Jenni Avins and Quartz that I think nailed it: The Dos and Don’ts of Cultural Appropriation. Blackface is never ok, don’t adopt sacred artifacts as fashion accessories, be sure give credit where credit is due . . . commonsense guidelines that don’t pretend culture isn’t fluid.

  9. R. Lee Smith May 1, 2019 @ 6:20 am

    ps: An additional thought. Those bawling like castrated calves about their Second Amendment rights had best leave their culture of loud complaints and quasi military dress at the monuments for shooting victims who have lost the most precious right of all. After all, would not a perfect Democracy be Anarchy constrained within each selective group’s sphere?
    R Lee Smith

  10. Risa Aratyr May 1, 2019 @ 3:59 pm

    Oooh – snap! Well said, Mr. Smith!

  11. R. Lee Smith May 1, 2019 @ 5:37 pm

    In order to avoid being quite such a phony the truth be known I too “may be a bit more gung-ho about privilege-class people upping their game in the realm of social sensitivity.” But a little more in the closet because I believe the only way to make change acceptable to my antitheses is by giving the impression of starting from a level playing field. After all the not so privileged may be reading over my shoulder. This is the opposite of 45’s MO as he purposely creates adversity. (I do hope he gets better and better at it. Maybe he could further separate the cast of Deliverance from the rest of humanity.)

    The Moderates are still here, they are just afraid and in hiding. These are the people we (at least I) want to dialog with. The true in-breeds hang on for dear life to Herbert Spencer’s model of being kept in everlasting ignorance by contempt prior to investigation.

    My motto is: Don’t pick at pimples. Use astringent in the hopes of killing the bacteria so they may heal.
    R. Lee Smith

  12. Risa Aratyr May 10, 2019 @ 12:44 pm

    I so admire your ability to “closet” the intensity of your true feelings in order to enact change. When I attempt to be politic, I transform into a human powder keg about to explode. So while you stand a chance of having a beneficial effect on those you meet, I simply preach to the converted.

A Beginner’s Guide to Cultural Appropriation

Write-Minded Comments (12)

Cultural appropriation is a hot topic these days.  And rightly so.  Getting woke to cultural appropriation ranks up there with waking up to white society’s systemic racism or male society’s inherent sexism.  It’s about time, past due.

Unfortunately, many are inclined to take the above balls and run with them right off the nearest politically-correct cliff.  When a white person protests, “I am not a racist!” they betray their congenital racism.  When men co-opt the role of victim from abused and harassed women, they betray their deep-seated misogyny.  Similarly, when someone issues edicts about what constitutes appropriation from cultures not their own, they betray their sense of cultural entitlement.  And when followers of a spiritual path extend their unwarranted sense of cultural entitlement to matters of faith, they have their heads up their collective asses.

What made me face-palm and inspired this rant was a post shared by my long-time friend and erstwhile coven-mate Oberon.  Apparently, it’s trendy among some “left-leaning” Pagan groups to police which gods their fellow Pagans are worshipping.

As an example, the author of the post cited a disturbing conversation regarding the Egyptian cat goddess Bast.  “Someone asked for advice on how to tell their white friends to stop revering her,” he tells us, “because obviously Bast isn’t a ‘white god.'”

Omg, I can’t even.

Oberon’s response was spot-on.  “How would you know that Bast doesn’t want white worshipers? Did she tell you? Did she tell you it’s your mission in life to ‘preach’ that only non-white people get to worship her? Did she tell you to kill people who worship in dog-centered cults like Cybele? It’s gets ridiculous pretty quickly.”

Indeed it does.  Neo-Pagans realize, don’t we, that our spiritual communities are modern social constructions, not authentic reconstructions of ancient religions?  At best, our rites are based on keen observation of the cosmos and natural world and a hefty amount of research.  More often they are a mix of inconclusive findings, subjective opinion, fond hopes, popular theories, intuition, imagination, and guesswork.  Nothing wrong with that, of course, but with so flimsy a foundation, where does anyone get the chutzpah to claim pope-like infallibility on matters affecting the heathen-sphere at large?  I’m not saying our goddesses and gods don’t speak to us.  I’m saying that if a voice is telling you you’ve got the right to dictate the parameters of someone else’s spiritual beliefs, that voice is your own.

Yes, there are a handful of bona fide “ethnic religions” that limit their membership to particular individuals (as opposed to “universal” religions like Islam, Christianity, and Jainism that claim to be free of national and geneological restrictions).  Some ethnic religions are denominations of larger, parent faiths and truly exclusive; you must be Assyrian to belong to the Assyrian Church of the East, for instance.  But non-inclusive sects (can I call them “sects”?) are rarities.  Judaism is also classified as an ethnic religion, yet anyone can choose to become Jewish – and make Jewish culture their own – any old time.  It’s a personal choice; ethnicity never enters into it.

If these holier-than-thou Pagans want to run with the idea that only those endowed with a specific ethnic heritage have the right to pray to specific deities, they need to take it to its utterly, patently, mind-bogglingly absurd conclusion.  Fair’s fair.  Religion is religion.  If they’re going to color-code the old ones, they’d better color-code the newer ones as well.

I can hear some of you objecting that it’s a false comparison; your (new-ish) god is the one true god, so, of course, your religion is one-size-fits-all.  Yeah, that don’t cut no ice with me.  Unless and until y’all cop to modern religions’ unbridled cultural appropriations, agree on the same mono-deity, and Christians stop doing the math wrong (father, son, holy ghost, mother, devil – that’s five gods off the top of my head), you don’t get to exempt your faith from the fair’s-fair cultural-appropriation assessment.  Religions travel.  Doesn’t prove anything.

As they are typically linked to fixed geographical features and localized natural phenomena, pantheistic-animistic belief systems are less prone to travel than monotheistic, pie-in-the-sky religions.  Yet they have done, as countless centuries of evidence attest, and none more compelling than the ubiquitous Venus figurines of the Upper Paleolithic that litter the Eurasian archeological landscape.  The record boasts some 20,000 years of sculpted clay and carved bone, rock, and antler honoring the voluptuous female form.

In the face of such widespread Goddess-worship, the fact that a few fanatic devotees of a few jealous gods felt compelled to journey to the ends of the earth proselytizing is a piss-poor reason for letting the new-fangled religions off the cultural-appropriation hook.  Besides, while not every deity has zealous missionary monks or other ready-made salespeople eager to run around the globe soliciting new adherents to the faith, as a rule, religions don’t turn away new customers.  Just because the Vikings didn’t demand the survivors of their raids sacrifice horses to Ođin or wear Thor’s-hammer amulets around their necks doesn’t mean they were averse to non-Norsemen making blót sacrifices, were they so inclined.

So fair’s fair.  If you have to be a brown-skinned North African to worship Bast, then you have to be a Semite, if not a Galilean, to worship Jesus.

Forensic anthropologist Richard Neave’s model of a Galilean man created for the 2001 BBC documentary, Son of God

Yes, I’m afraid all but a select few Christians are morally obligated to leave the church and revert to their ancestral faiths pronto . . . which, too bad, is going to be dang tricky for African-Americans whose ancestors were violently and irrevocably torn from their families and cultures by slavers and made to kneel before their oppressors’ gods, for First Peoples whose ancestors were driven from their sacred lands by colonialists and from their spiritual traditions by the forced assimilation policies of the boarding schools, and indeed for all indigenous peoples who lost the spiritual core of their identities through the religio-centrism of Christian missionaries.  It’s going to be dang tricky for adoptees who share no genes with their parents.  Now I think about it, it’s going to be dang tricky for the Vatican, too . . . guess Christianity is pretty much a bust if we’re going to insist people ditch their culturally-inappropriate gods.

Obviously, you’ve got to be an Arab to call yourself a Muslim and pray to Allah.  Presupposing the current hypotheses regarding Siddartha’s origins are correct, only those who can trace their lineage to the 5th century eastern Indian subcontinent have what it takes to be Buddhist.  And yikes, guess I need to stop practicing Tai Chi Chu’an and burn my copies of the Tao Te Ching.  I am ethno-culturally unqualified to revere Lao Tsu.

Or am I? I have the right look, or at least I did in my youth.

Ah, but what you’re seeing there is a drop of Siberian DNA.  I don’t have any East Asian chromosomes linking me to the Chu state of the Zhou dynasty.  Alas, seems the Tao and I must part Ways.

My baby pic raises a good question, though.  Do the PC Cultural Appropriation Police figure mixed-lineage people like me get multiple deity options – or do we get none?

Either way, if spirituality is a function of ethnicity, most of us are following the “wrong” faith.  How do we know which is the right one?  Guess it depends on how far back we need to go to save the poor, defenseless gods from the ravages of political incorrectness.  Maybe those left-leaning Pagans should set up a Worship Court where they can sit in smug self-righteousness and presume to assign us our appropriate deities based on our skin color and geneology test kits.

Scratch that.  Don’t want to give them ideas.

Because to believe it is possible to make a direct, unambiguous connection between the peoples of today and the peoples of the distant past assumes human history is ethnically stagnant, devoid of migration, conquest, intermarriage, exploration, adoption, and evolution.  To believe it is possible to assign ancient pantheons to finite geographic locations and, presumably therefore, distinct ethnic affiliations assumes religious history is equally stagnant; that the old gods did not migrate, conquer, intermarry, explore, adopt, and evolve as well.  And for modern-day Pagans to believe they are protecting the old gods’ cultural purview by imposing arbitrary limits on which deities people are allowed to love is hubris on a Oedipal scale.

And look where that got him.

I’m sounding sanctimonious myself, so let me take a deep breath and focus for a moment on the double-helix crux of the problem:  confusion about what constitutes cultural appropriation and entitled indifference toward figuring it out.

MIS-appropriation happens when a dominant and privileged people or society adopts the customs, beliefs, and/or practices of another, generally less-privileged people or society inappropriately and/or without acknowledgement.

Dolling up with “fashion dots”?  Cultural appropriation.

The bindi is a tradition among Hindu women, worn for religious reasons or to show they are married.  Sure, there may be a totes legit reason for a non-Hindu woman to wear one – and if there is, those who own the tradition will put it on her themselves.

Photo: Pawan Bhurtel
from a blog by Lise Bjerke

A men’s group grabbing some congas and djembes, dragging them down to the beach, and whacking away at them?  Internet-initiated Pagans donning fake feathers and fringe and pouring colored sand on the ground?  Cultural appropriation.

Why?  Because messing about with the rites, arts, and traditions of other cultures from a place of willful ignorance smacks of colonial privilege, racism, and exploitation.  But it is totes legit for someone to apprentice to a Master Drummer and join drumming circles with the Master’s blessing, and totes legit to learn about sand paintings from a Diné source.  Don’t take without asking; that’s stealing.  Seek permission to learn; that’s respect.

Becoming PC is a life-long process involving painful self-examination.  These “left-leaning” Pagans’ ill-considered, patronizing response to the need for sensitivity in the area of cultural appropriation stems from laziness and impatience.  They don’t want to have to think their way through nuanced and endlessly varied situations for the rest of their lives.  They want a no-brainer, binary choice:  yes/no, black/white.  Literally.

There is no easy choice.  Cultures shift, morph, migrate, grow, evolve, expand, and diminish; cultural parameters are fluid.  We may have one ethnicity or many.  We may be culturally rich or culturally destitute.  We may find joy and succor in the religion we were born to, or we may be called upon to serve other gods.

What’s easy is distinguishing between the trappings of religion and deities.  The former – the rituals, traditions, customs, and practices – must be done appropriately and with acknowlegement, or not done at all.  But when it comes to the latter, there’s not a person on the planet, Pagan or otherwise, with the spiritual cachet or moral authority to dictate which gods we sing to when the sun shines on our hearts or whose Names we call in the dark nights of the soul.

Risa Aratyr @ April 7, 2019

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>